… and some more than just a bit!
You’ve probably heard the old saying: “Every joke has a bit of truth in it.” It’s a reminder that even when we’re laughing at something exaggerated or silly, there’s often a kernel of reality hiding underneath. And nowhere is this more evident than in the world of wine “experts.”
Picture the scene: A group of people at a dinner party or a tasting event. Someone swirls their glass dramatically, sniffs it like they’re solving a mystery, and then launches into a monologue: “Ah, yes… notes of blackcurrant, wet forest floor, a hint of graphite pencil shavings, and just a whisper of grandmother’s attic on a rainy day.” Everyone nods sagely, as if this makes perfect sense. The self-proclaimed connoisseur looks smug, and suddenly you’re wondering if your palate is broken because all you get is… wine.
These wine snobs (or “enthusiasts,” as they prefer to be called) talk about wine as if it’s an objective science, with strict rules about what’s “good” and what’s “trash.” They dismiss affordable bottles as undrinkable and elevate obscure vintages to god-like status. But here’s the punchline—and the truth behind the joke: Wine is fundamentally a matter of personal taste, smell, and how your body reacts to it. It’s subjective, individual, and deeply personal.
No two people experience the same wine exactly the same way. Our senses are influenced by genetics, past experiences, mood, food pairings, and even the glass we’re drinking from. What tastes like heaven to one person might be meh (or worse) to another. The elaborate descriptions? They’re helpful guides sometimes, but often they’re just performative— a way to signal sophistication rather than genuinely describe the experience.
To prove how individual perception really drives our judgments, think about something far removed from wine: Coca-Cola. The first time many people try Coke (especially as kids), it burns! The carbonation stings, the sweetness is overwhelming, and it can taste downright bad or weird. But over time, with repeated exposure, millions grow to love it—crave it, even. The exact same drink shifts from “gross” to “delicious” based on personal adaptation and context. No one calls you unsophisticated for not liking Coke on the first sip, or for preferring Pepsi. Why? Because we accept that soft drinks are subjective. The same logic applies to wine: Your first encounter with a bold red might be tannic and bitter, but later it could become your favorite.
And let’s be honest, a lot of the “expert” talk is ripe for parody. Check out this hilarious video of a woman pretending to be a total wine connoisseur, spouting absolute nonsense with complete confidence:
(Video: “Me pretending I know anything about wine” by HelloGiggles – pure comedic gold.)
She nails the pretentious swirl-sniff-sip routine, guessing ridiculous details like “vintage 2016?” while clearly having no clue. It’s funny because we’ve all seen (or been) versions of this. But the joke lands because there’s truth in it: Much of wine expertise is learned vocabulary layered over personal preference. Strip away the jargon, and we’re all just reacting individually to flavors, aromas, and that pleasant buzz.
So next time someone lectures you on why their €200 bottle is superior, smile and remember the saying. Raise your glass (whatever’s in it) to what you enjoy. After all, the best wine is the one that tastes good to you. Cheers! 🍷

